It was summer in LA,the detective was wearing light tan slacks and a light blue shirt. I suppose he transported a “bloody’ glove from one place to another, OJ’s Home, within an hour without having a mess of blood ‘on his hands”.. Did he wipe his hands on his pants or shirt? Did he previously know who’s glove it was? Did he consider that the blood may have been from an HIV person? OJ’s blood was in her house and her blood was in his house. I suppose the detective also transported some of each of theirs blood in a vile, all this while the crime scene was full of cops, uniform and detective, large lights lighting the scene and swarms of reporters around the area. Right, OJ was framed
Did I say that OJ was innocent?
All I was saying is that the way the second glove was found was too cute. IMHO, the police tried to improve an already strong case by relocating evidence, and in so doing introduced reasonable doubt and lost what should have been a slam-dunk.