Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce

Are “permissions”, (sorry, old Unix term), used with Linux?

If so, would you please discuss their significance to the security of a system?


20 posted on 09/05/2012 8:46:38 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Graewoulf
Are “permissions”, (sorry, old Unix term), used with Linux?

Yes, permissions are used in Linux. They are granular enough that you can assign individual users to have rights on individual files.

If so, would you please discuss their significance to the security of a system?

Every process runs "as a user" of some sort--whether that is an actual user or a service account. Each account is assigned groups and permissions. As a normal user on a linux system, I would not have permission to delete or modify some system files, for instance. As the Apache user, I can run everything needed to operate a web server, but not really anything else.

For a piece of malware to perform any real damage to a system, it would have to run with elevated privileges--typically root. If I download a piece of malware, it would usually "belong" to me--that is it would have the same privileges I do. That is why you should never surf the web, or log in as root. If the malware were to run, it would only be able to damage my user account, rather than the system as a whole.

22 posted on 09/06/2012 3:09:09 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson