To: Altariel
I respected the Democrat party back when they cared about the Fourth Amendment (The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.). Today’s progressives merely disgust me. There is no excuse for these seizures.
5 posted on
08/31/2012 9:19:33 AM PDT by
Pollster1
(Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. - Ronald Reagan)
To: Pollster1
I respected the Democrat party back when they cared about the Fourth Amendment (The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.). Todays progressives merely disgust me. There is no excuse for these seizures.Can't put it all on the dems. Republican hands are just as dirty in the drug war.
8 posted on
08/31/2012 10:01:24 AM PDT by
Ken H
To: Pollster1; E. Pluribus Unum
According to Thomas V. Kukura, J.D. of the DEA, "It was not until 1984 that Congress, in 21 U.S.C. Section 881(a)(7) of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), authorized the civil forfeiture of real property used or intended to be used to facilitate drug trafficking." (https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/132714NCJRS.pdf)
Do you recall who was President then?
9 posted on
08/31/2012 10:43:09 AM PDT by
JustSayNoToNannies
(A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson