To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
“...and leaving a loved one to die — alone and afraid — in the cold and the wild.”
A dog that weighs over 100 lbs, on a 14,000’ mountain?
If the dog refuses to move, and you don’t have both special equipment and lots of help, then the dog AIN’T coming down. If it were me, I would go back, but it would take blind luck to find the dog a few days after the storm. The rescuers were only able to do so because the dog became too weak to move on its own from where one person stumbled upon it.
45 posted on
08/18/2012 1:57:14 PM PDT by
Mr Rogers
(Liberalism: "Ex faslo quodlibet" - from falseness, anything follows)
To: Mr Rogers
There's a vast, yawning and (for most folks, at any rate) readily comprehensible difference between someone dying of natural causes, and leaving a loved one to die -- alone and afraid -- in the cold and the wild.A dog that weighs over 100 lbs, on a 14,000 mountain?
Again: "[...] for most folks..."
50 posted on
08/18/2012 2:03:19 PM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
To: Mr Rogers
But they did find it didn't they?
Stop defending the indefensible!
52 posted on
08/18/2012 2:04:48 PM PDT by
fortheDeclaration
(Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
To: Mr Rogers
The dog was lame and couldn’t walk. The owner would have found her if he would have returned to rescue her... but he chose not to. And now he wants the dog back. The nerve...
93 posted on
08/18/2012 3:40:58 PM PDT by
ladyrustic
(Get in the face of a liberal in honor of Breitbart.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson