To: xsmommy
It is still monitoring food expenditures. Cut welfare if you want ... I’m fine with that. But, if you’re going to give it to ‘em, let them buy their food without a babysitter. Its just a pie. Not the best use of welfare money ... but not nearly the worst. There are bigger fish to fry.
Businesses should have the option of not accepting food stamps, though. Not sure if they do.
SnakeDoc
15 posted on
08/15/2012 5:06:13 AM PDT by
SnakeDoctor
("I've shot people I like more for less." -- Raylan Givens, Justified)
To: SnakeDoctor
When young mother’s get WIC cards they are limited in their food selections. There are signs in the stores designating which items are allowed. I think the same should apply to EBT cards,
22 posted on
08/15/2012 5:37:00 AM PDT by
heylady
(“Sometimes I wish I could be a Democrat and then I remember I have a soul.”( Deb))
To: SnakeDoctor
Being on welfare should be uncomfortable.
35 posted on
08/15/2012 6:33:54 AM PDT by
dfwgator
To: SnakeDoctor
Businesses should have the option of not accepting food stamps, though. Not sure if they do.
But that's exactly what's happening here. It's a private retailer saying no, I will not accept EBT for my products. No one is monitoring what people are eating.
37 posted on
08/15/2012 6:36:09 AM PDT by
andyk
(Go Juan Pablo!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson