Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bluetick

They only banned him from bringing kids into the showers to eliminate the potential for anymore incidents where abuse could occur.

As far as his office, it was part of his retirement agreement negotiated with the university and not something that could be unilaterally just taken away.

The administrators contacted his charity expecting that it would do something to reel Sandusky in — but in retrospect it didn’t, even though its CEO was Dr Raykovitz, a child psychologist with connections to Child Youth Services and the Department of Public Welfare.

And according to the Freeh Report, the plan worked out by Curley, Schultz and Spanier with legal counsel was to also notify the DPW directly. What happened to that will have to come from Curley as it was on his To Do list.


71 posted on 08/14/2012 5:22:16 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Chip

I am not sure I am fully following you.

After McQueary or whatever his name is reported the “fondling” by Sandusky to Coach Paterno, Sandusky wandered around campus unfettered (except for a ban on bringing little boys) for another decade or so.

Am I misconstruing this, or is it true?


73 posted on 08/14/2012 5:35:58 PM PDT by bluetick (If you're going to err, err on the side of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson