The article is an examination of inequality from the progressive perspective. Of course it presumes too much and defines terms and ideas in ways that are simply untrue, even bizarre in their reinterpretation.
I will not take my moral or ethical guides for "fairness" from a liberal of any stripe.
[ The entire premise of the article is based on the preposterous liberal assumption that all people are equal or must be made to be so. ]
I thought they value everyone’s differences? So again they try to have it both ways and end up living in a schitzophrenic wonderland of the “nobel savage” and the “state created ubermench”.