Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: moonshot925
It is my understanding that the Marines also had these weapons. They went over the side about two weeks after a landing as I recall.
To: moonshot925
I remember reading about those when I was a kid and they were still deployed. Pretty cool, but not terribly practical as a theater weapon. To big and stationary . . . even in the 50's.
Thanks for the memories.
3 posted on
08/12/2012 3:52:45 PM PDT by
Sudetenland
(Member of the BBB Club - Bye-Bye-Barry!!! President Barack "Down Low" Obama)
To: moonshot925
Everyone should have one!!
![Image Hosted by ImageShack.us](http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/9362/zotbangpoof3pp.gif)
![ZOT ZOT ZOT](http://img281.imageshack.us/img281/2528/m1small6ye.jpg)
4 posted on
08/12/2012 3:58:18 PM PDT by
Delta 21
(Oh Crap !! Did I say that out loud ??!??)
To: moonshot925
Amazing pictures. I have a few targets in mind...
6 posted on
08/12/2012 4:04:46 PM PDT by
andyk
(Go Juan Pablo!)
To: moonshot925
*THIS* is what I mean when I say "Second Amendment".
I mean, suppose there is a LOT of deer? Suppose they are all operating Russian T-90 tanks?
7 posted on
08/12/2012 4:05:59 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
(I love the Universe, and it loves me.)
To: moonshot925
8 posted on
08/12/2012 4:06:28 PM PDT by
tanuki
(Left-wing Revolution: show biz for boring people.)
To: moonshot925
Awesome!
That’s very interesting. I’d never knew we had nuclear artillery units. I bet those were pretty risky for the guys on the ground, depending on which way the wind is blowing and all.
It never ceases to amaze me in how the Iranians(among others) are still trying to catch up to where we were 60-70 years ago in the ‘nuclear age’ of warfare.
9 posted on
08/12/2012 4:11:08 PM PDT by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: moonshot925
It was an awesome cannon, but the fact it was extremely unwieldy to move around was the reason why as soon as the we got nuclear artillery that could be fired from 155 mm howitzers these were quickly retired. This probably why they eventually replaced this cannon (plus other short range ballistic missiles) with the much more capable MGM-52 Lance missile, which was air tranportable with the C-5 Galaxy.
10 posted on
08/12/2012 4:14:17 PM PDT by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's economic cure)
To: moonshot925
In many pics of Atomic explosions, what are those white streaks you often see near the ‘Mushroom Cloud’ that appear to be going up and down from the ground to the sky? (anyone know?)
They almost appear to be from a secondary explosion of some sort from within the bomb itself.
13 posted on
08/12/2012 4:22:58 PM PDT by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: moonshot925
Could have used one of these puppies on Co roc Mt. Tora Bora as well...
14 posted on
08/12/2012 4:27:52 PM PDT by
donozark
(I never trusted anyone above the rank of Corporal, including myself.)
To: moonshot925
I still have my copy of my nuclear clearance from being in the Artillery.
15 posted on
08/12/2012 4:33:48 PM PDT by
ansel12
(Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP goes for it's "conservative" Presidential candidates.)
To: moonshot925
This would a great add on to have on my car for those tough commute days.
The guy driving slow in the left lane who just won't get over; could finally and decisively be dealt with.
18 posted on
08/12/2012 4:39:44 PM PDT by
HereInTheHeartland
(Encourage all of your Democrat friends to get out and vote on November 7th, the stakes are high.)
To: moonshot925
I was stationed at Ft Sill in 1968 saw one of these babies up close!!!
19 posted on
08/12/2012 4:43:49 PM PDT by
ontap
To: moonshot925
You should have seen our nuclear 40mm rounds fired from an M79 or M203. Each shot was "danger close." Glad we never had to use them.
![](http://www.prc68.com/I/Images/40mmAS1w.jpg)
25 posted on
08/12/2012 4:58:30 PM PDT by
OldCorps
To: moonshot925
Are they as bad as assault rifles?
27 posted on
08/12/2012 4:59:43 PM PDT by
353FMG
To: moonshot925
What if one of those suckers had a HANG-FIRE?
29 posted on
08/12/2012 5:02:46 PM PDT by
Old Sarge
(We are now officially over the precipice, we just havent struck the ground yet)
To: moonshot925
M65 Atomic Cannon ("Atomic Annie") After a few drinks with a Los Alamos newkyewler program manager, this atomic cannon came up in the conversation.
He couldn't stop laughing.
37 posted on
08/12/2012 5:26:57 PM PDT by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: moonshot925
There was also the
W-23 naval nuclear artillery shell, deliverable from the 16 inch guns of an Iowa-class battleship.
At 15-20 kt, it would have made a hell of a shore bombardment.
43 posted on
08/12/2012 5:58:18 PM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(A deep-fried storm is coming, Mr Obama.)
To: moonshot925
FTA:
The units were hosted by the 42nd Field Artillery Group. My LANCE battalion was part of that group when I was in West Germany, well after the time Atomic Annie had been sent to the Field Artillery Museum at Fort Sill OK. The article doesn't state but the cannon follow-ons for the group were the 8" howitzer and the 175mm gun. The rocket/missile units were Honest John and Sergeant. My battalion converted from the Sergeant system about 5 years before I got there.
50 posted on
08/12/2012 6:33:01 PM PDT by
T-Bird45
(It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
To: moonshot925
I had a toy one in the fifties. It was one of the best toys I ever had because not only did it have the cannon which shot a 2”-3” projectile a good 80’, but it also came with the two trucks (front and back) that transported it. Three toys in one. When my mother discovered that I was shooting cars that passed the house she took the rubber tipped projectiles and hid them from me. I then discovered it would shoot sticks or arrows just as effectively. With the two tractors, the whole thing was about three feet long and I think it was made by the Marx Toy Company.
57 posted on
08/12/2012 7:53:28 PM PDT by
Free_SJersey
(Celebrate Diversity------------ Divide and Conquer?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson