Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Melas
Well, the remakes of two movies I mentioned were supposed to be retellings true to Kings original writings, which I assumed meant he had control over the scripts and the directing. Regardless, they were awful.
93 posted on 08/03/2012 3:28:51 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: skeeter

Well, the version of The Shining that you liked so much, was brilliant because it was a Kubrick movie. What you’re watching is Stanley Kubrick’s brilliance, not Stephen King’s story. It deviated heavily from the book, and King fans weren’t happy with it. Kubrick especially downplayed Danny’s pyschic abilities, which Halloran calls the Shining. Fans were understandably unhappy that a detail so crucial that it lent the work it’s very name is so underplayed.

Ditto for Salem’s Lot. The orginal with David Soul took so many liberties with the novel that it’s barely the same story. The remake did a much better job, especially with Barlow.


98 posted on 08/03/2012 3:40:38 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson