Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PA Engineer
Are you sure about that grounding part?

That's what I remember reading. Is it wrong?

45 posted on 08/02/2012 11:00:15 PM PDT by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: danielmryan
The only purpose I can see is safety. Depending on the size of the cage you could develop a significant charge and "possible" shock hazard. That being said, all items stored inside the cage need to be electrically isolated from the internal surface. This is in regards to electronics protection and not radio work.

My personal opinion is that many devices will not be effected by EMP. YMMV, but battery operated devices without antenna should be just fine. Anything not plugged in should mitigate many of the problems of long line issues.

My greatest concern is still the installed inverters in a backup system. Further, imagine the wiring in the walls of your house. This is one heck of an antenna.

For more information check out this Wiki Link (it is wiki, but pretty decent). Pay particular attention to the discussion on E1. This is the electronics killer, but requires a high degree of sophistication in weapons construction. There is a discussion here where concerns are raised that E1 will damage protective devices that would protect against the second E2 (think lightening and static electricity) component. That I don't know about. Finally there is a discussion of E3. E3 is not static electricity. E3 is the component equivalent to the effects of CMEs.
58 posted on 08/03/2012 11:24:53 AM PDT by PA Engineer ("We're not programs, Gerty, We're People")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson