Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CatherineofAragon
“the fact that you something on TV.”

Sorry, I meant that you saw something on tv.

Romney said he was in favor of homosexual adoption Personally.

He said he was in favor of Homosexual adoptions? He wants homosexuals to adopt children?

Here is what he actually said:
"In my state, individuals of the same sex were able to adopt children. In my view, that's something that people have a right to do," Romney said in an interview with Fox News Thursday. "But to call that marriage is something that in my view is a departure from the real meaning of that word."

That is a long way from saying that "he personally is in favor of homosexual adoption". He is stating a legal position, not a personal preference.
He later backed away from the idea that he was encouraging homosexual adoption.

Obama is very relevant here because we now have a choice between these two people for the next POTUS. To me the subject is the comparison between Obama and Romney. If you feel you are here to pass judgment on Romney alone, I don't really see the point.

173 posted on 07/27/2012 7:15:03 PM PDT by oldbrowser (As long as Obama's records are sealed, any discussion of Romney's past is off limits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: oldbrowser
Just to be clear, I didn't see anything on TV. I read it here. Look, you're doing what a lot of Romney supporters end up doing---struggling to justify voting for him. Vote for him if you want. That's fine, it's your decision. But please don't try to make him out to be anything except what he is, and that is a liberal who has a definite fondness for homosexuals. Only a leftist would think that sodomites have a RIGHT to adopt children. And, if there's any doubt he's personally in favor of it, here's what he said in June of 2007:

“There are other ways to raise kids that’s fine: single moms, grandparents raising kids, gay couples raising kids. That’s the American way, to have people have their freedom of choice."

Of course he backed away from it later, LOL---that's what he DOES. Any viewpoint he espouses is only valid until he decides it's politically expedient to flip.

Read The Real Romney. It's not a hit piece, it's very fairly written and, at times, admiring. But it shows how Romney went to great lengths in MA to cozy up to homosexuals, to let them know he was there to do what they needed, and to make sure they weren't "discriminated against."

I'm sick of having sodomites shoved down my throat, and I make no excuses for anyone who supports them.

192 posted on 07/27/2012 8:15:03 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson