Don’t understand your comment?
It’s pretty weak tea compared to the Armstrong Engineering Building.
>>Don’t understand your comment?
Well, I know that Purdue has the Earhart papers, but I think if they were going to name a building (or dining “court”) after a famous aviatrix, they could have picked a few who were more successful in their endeavors. Could the papers have come with a Putnam $$ grant? Don’t know; maybe that was the influence...
(I’m an ERAU grad, BTW)