[Uncle Chip]

Did you know that the jury acquitted Sandusky of any criminal action in the incident that McQueary reported to Paterno. This incident around which there was supposedly this great coverup was found by the jury to be a non-incident.

http://www.johnziegler.com/editorials_details.asp?editorial=215

Is it true that there is a note in the Freeh Report from Paterno to Sandusky telling him not to bring The Second Mile kids to the football facilities anymore???

[outpostinmass2]

Did you know that the jury acquitted Sandusky of any criminal action in the incident that McQueary reported to Paterno. This incident around which there was supposedly this great coverup was found by the jury to be a non-incident.

http://www.johnziegler.com/editorials_details.asp?editorial=215

---

Is your real name John Ziegler? Your posts here match his editorials.
Yes I did know this and no it doesn't change anything.
The problem for you, Ziegler and the other Paterno apologist is that the shower victim has come forward now. If the victim had come forward during the trial Sandusky would have been convicted of that charge as well.

Before writing anymore theories you should read-up on Occam's razor:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor

The Freeh Report has this statement written about five times “No record or communication indicates that anyone made any effort to determine the identity of the child in the shower or whether the child had been harmed.”