[Uncle Chip]

I found the Freeh report to be factual and unbiased unlike the critics of the report.

Upon what fact does he rely when concluding that "coach" in the one email referred to Paterno??? Where is his fact for that???

Isn't it reasonable to conclude that the word "Coach" in the one email referred to Sandusky and not Paterno???

How does he reach a conclusion on the basis of two emails neither of which are from Paterno.

My links were only a few pages. You send me 359 pages.

[outpostinmass2]

The report only takes a couple of hours to read through. The fonts are large.