So if she’d been sixteen then it would be okay for her to be shot dead in a movie theater? I’m not sure I understand the point here.
We can argue all day long about what entertainment content is acceptable for children at what age, and opinions certainly differ on that, but I’m not seeing how the act of taking a child to a midnight movie makes the mother responsible for James Holmes killing the child, and shooting the mother in the process. She’s currently in critical condition in the hospital, shot twice in the abdomen and once in the neck. If she lives, her life is never going to be the same. Hopefully she doesn’t have people like you in her life who can tell her what a Bad Mom she was and it’s all her fault. Because it’s not.
I agree, especially because no matter what anybody says she’ll be blaming herself anyway.