Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: tarheelswamprat
Why should judges, lawyers, et al. be entitled to a "better" CHL which offers more protection than the rest of their fellow citizens?

Uh, SOME lawyers (the ones employed by the State). I'm a lawyer who isn't, and I have to obey the same rules as everyone else. FYI, I'm not at all in agreement with the idea and the fact that some people are treated as super-citizens while the rest of us aren't. That goes for law enforcement (employees/agents of us citizens - how can they have more rights than those that empowered them to be their agents?) and ESPECIALLY FORMER law enforcement (otherwise known as "our fellow citizens").

63 posted on 07/20/2012 9:43:42 AM PDT by Ancesthntr (Bibi to Odumbo: Its not going to happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: All

I hate to tell Cinemark but I have carried in their theatres many times.


65 posted on 07/20/2012 9:45:22 AM PDT by micmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Ancesthntr; jagusafr
Uh, SOME lawyers (the ones employed by the State). I'm a lawyer who isn't, and I have to obey the same rules as everyone else.

Right. I meant to say prosecutors, as jagusafr stated. That distinction reinforces the point, that we now have a two-tiered, double-standard caricature of the rule of law wherein our "public officials" have arrogated to themselves special rights and privileges.

76 posted on 07/20/2012 10:18:32 AM PDT by tarheelswamprat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson