Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lancey Howard

I am a Catholic who pretty much disagrees with Mormons up and down the line, except for to the degree that their religion proscribes behavior consistent with natural law (pro-life, etc.)

I certainly have absolutely no use for Romney whatsoever and will not be voting for him.

This cover looked like a bad attempt at satire. It is unfair to Mormons, but it is also to me offensive because it is using an image of Our Lord to make fun of Mormons.

On top of that, why should Business Week, of all publications, care if a religion flush with cash manages to find ways to legally use it without being liable for taxes on said use? Why does it matter if it is a Polynesian amusement park? Disney et al are happy to wrest tax concessions when they can get them. I don’teven hold it against Rush Limbaugh that he likes investing in tax free munis. Hey Business Week, it is going back into the economy. It’s all good. Except Burger King, that has gone way downhill since the decession hit.


23 posted on 07/16/2012 3:40:20 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (May Mitt Romney have the mother of all Macaca moments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Sivana
...but it is also to me offensive because it is using an image of Our Lord to make fun of Mormons.

I wasn't sure if that was supposed to be Jesus, or Joseph Smith.

27 posted on 07/16/2012 7:50:40 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Sivana

mormonISM is not pro-life. There maybe some mormons who are, the foundation is not.


31 posted on 07/16/2012 10:19:51 AM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson