Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: tumblindice

My father was an armorer when he was in Europe during WWII. He worked on Quad-50’s and Bofors.

I could see Quad-50’s on such a boat with a few anti-tank weapons for good measure.


6 posted on 07/11/2012 9:10:13 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Fossil

http://www.rt66.com/~korteng/SmallArms/PrincipalWeapons.htm

“Quad .50: A half-track mounting four .50s capable of being fired as a unit. Developed as an anti-aircraft weapon, as an antipersonnel weapon it was capable of hurling an immense amount of fire into hillsides and valleys against advancing infantry, or long-range harassing fire against enemy movement routes at night. Firing as many as 100,000 rounds a day, the Quad .50 could go over hills like a vacuum cleaner, sucking them devoid of life.”

The Germans had something similar, a `Werbel’ (Whirlwind’)? and used it a lot after they lost control of the air.
That’d work!

I was thinking of something the Marines used— 4 recoilless rifles? An Ontos(?) That might be even better for cartel caravan work.


7 posted on 07/11/2012 9:17:03 PM PDT by tumblindice (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Texas Fossil

Bofors twin mount like the AA mounts on WWII USN ships.


15 posted on 07/11/2012 9:53:15 PM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson