Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Altariel

Unconstitutional? They have been challenged in court on several occasions and have been found very much in compliance. I don’t happen to agree, but who am I to argue with the courts. As for the SWAT teams ignoring the Constitution, they are complying with the orders of a judge somewhere. A warrant can’t be exercised without a judge’s signature.

Once again, I’m not in anyway trying to justify the no knock warrant, just stating the facts.

As a retired officer I never thought the no knock was constitutional but the courts said so, so who was I to disagree (by the way, I never served a no knock in all my 28 years).


33 posted on 07/10/2012 5:48:53 PM PDT by doc1019 (Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: doc1019

The courts have ruled a lot of non-constitutional matters to be “constitutional” .

No knock warrants are unconstitutional. Period.

None of the founders would have supported government employees serving a warrant by intruding into a citizen’s home.


35 posted on 07/10/2012 6:12:58 PM PDT by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: doc1019
Unconstitutional? They have been challenged in court on several occasions and have been found very much in compliance.

Hadn't you heard? SCOTUS now lies about what's Constitutional and not.

Who am I to argue with the courts?

Uh, their boss -- the source of their salary? And someone with an actual job that produces wealth, as opposed to incinerating it, as by definition any government job does?

44 posted on 07/10/2012 6:56:59 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson