Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Black_Shark
There is a reason the bet players of all time used a 1-handed backhand ya know.

The 1- handed is the most versatile and dangerous stroke in tennis.

Sorry, but that's still wrong. Guys like Federer and Sampras who use that shot are moving their arm one foot to move the racket head one foot which is like lifting a stone with your arms rather than using a lever or arm punching in boxing. You can always tell the arm puncher in a prize fight, he's the guy being carried out in a wheelbarrow.

The whole world watched Juan Martín del Potro break that one handed shot of Federer's down at the US open in 09 and I assume that's the only reason Federer ever has any problem with Del Potro since other than for that one shot Federer's a much better player.

11 posted on 07/08/2012 2:29:03 PM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: varmintman

Your ignorance on this subject is quite annoying.

Go watch footage of Federer’s 1-handed return of serve or footage of when he takes the ball early. The racquet starts off low-mid thigh and ends shoulder height. No backswing required.

The only time you need to take a backswing is when you have plenty of time to set up. Even then, it is a restricted backhand.

Now, from my own personal experience (I have used both 2 and 1-handed extensively in USTA Junior’s and I was pretty darn good) the 2-handed limits creativity and is pretty darn predictable. It’s reach is also quite limited so it takes more energy to use a 2-handed because one must take 1+ more steps to reach a ball than a 1-handed.

A 1-handed, on the other hand, has great reach, very unpredictable (easy to conceal a slice or dropshot by making it look like your regular stroke) and can create angles that the 2 can’t hope to match.

There is more to the stroke than just how much you move the racquet head ya know.

The ONLY weakness (and it’s a big one) of the 1-hander is the high (above shoulder height) backhand shot. That sucker is HARD. Other than that, the 1-hander is better in every way. The 2-hander is easier to learn and requires less athletic ability to become consistent. That is why it is prevalent.

But what do I know? I’ve only played tennis for 20 years.


14 posted on 07/09/2012 6:36:36 PM PDT by Black_Shark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson