Uh, okay. Doesn't intent follow the path of the bullet?
To: nickcarraway
To: nickcarraway
So, in Sweden it’s perfectly legal for a man to involuntarily sodomize another man?
3 posted on
07/06/2012 9:32:14 AM PDT by
Psycho_Bunny
(Future generations will curse what we've done to them.)
To: nickcarraway
However, the court has ruled that the 61-year-old had intended to rape a woman, as he had been following her before the attack, making a conscious decision to rape her specifically. The man also
referred to his victim as "she" throughout the court case.
*****************************************
Guilty, I don't care what kind of freak his targeted victim may have been.
4 posted on
07/06/2012 9:33:16 AM PDT by
Irenic
(The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
To: nickcarraway
The victim was assaulted with the intention of rape, is that not a crime in Sweden? No wonder Sweden is going down the tubes.
5 posted on
07/06/2012 9:34:21 AM PDT by
HerrBlucher
("The cross opens its arms to the four winds; it is a signpost for free travelers." GK Chesterton)
To: nickcarraway
The Judge is dead wrong.
True Story.I was sent to a nightclub in Washington DC for a rape.
The dressing rooms were in the basement: Many girls were there and I went to the one who was raped to attend to her.
It runs out this club was a club for female impersonators. The she was a he who had come into the club through the allet entrance —was met there by a molester and when the molester found he had a male instead of a female he raped the male in his rectum.
To say it is impossible to rape a male dressed as a female is a boatload of horse dung.
Animals who rape, may prefer a woman, but those who have been in prison before take any port in a storm.Many males in Washington DC and other cities. who have been to prison and call themselves straight will force themselves on men in prison and go back to females when they get out.
6 posted on
07/06/2012 9:34:31 AM PDT by
Venturer
To: nickcarraway
8 posted on
07/06/2012 9:35:45 AM PDT by
meyer
(It's 1860 all over again - the taxpayer is the new "N" word)
To: nickcarraway
Save the males from sexist judges.
11 posted on
07/06/2012 10:50:43 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Fools.Damn fools.Welcome to the USSA. Socialism is slavery to the State and the Supreme Court did it)
To: nickcarraway
Paraphrasing our Erstwhile-Rapist-in-Chief:
"It depends on what your definition of 'rape' is..."
(Or, in the words of his aptly-name sycophant, Whoopie: it wasn't "rape" rape.)
13 posted on
07/06/2012 11:58:30 AM PDT by
Nevermore
(...just a typical cracker, clinging to my Constitutional rights...)
To: nickcarraway
Apparently, according
to this, the "victim" (I think that is a gender-neutral way to put it) is appealing the decision.
14 posted on
07/06/2012 12:11:21 PM PDT by
markomalley
(Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good-Pope Leo XIII)
To: nickcarraway
We can no longer have clarity in news stories with this PC crap. The “woman’s” ex-boyfriend? None of these people is or ever will be a “woman.”
Anyway, must have been a shock when his grope turned into a grab. He shoukd have just said he was pretending to be Crocodile Dundee.
19 posted on
07/06/2012 2:29:18 PM PDT by
Rastus
To: nickcarraway
Okay, so we ARE living in the freaking Twilight Zone of liberal insanity.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson