You are simply incapable of discussing ideas rationally.
We were talking about who Romney would appoint.
Now the subject is Democratic filibuster?
It would be up to the GOP Senate caucus to manage the Senate approval process of Romney’s judicial appointments, IF Romney is elected President, and IF we get GOP control of the Senate.
It is Romney’s job to keep his word as to who he’d appoint.
Try to post a little more coherently, m’kay?
It figures you'd claim that because you can't refute the points I'm making.
You want to live a fantasy world and believe Romney is something he isn't or ever will be.
It's like Charlie Brown, Lucy and the football. You never learn that electing liberal Republicans doesn't work.
You have never heard of Robert Bork and that he was filibustered? You don't understand that is a tactic Democrats have used against Republican nominees to the courts?
And, given Romney's lack of conviction and willingness to govern out of political expediency, why on earth do you think he'd fight to get a conservative judge onto SCOTUS? He didn't even try to fight for even moderate judges in Massachusetts.
It is Romney’s job to keep his word as to who he’d appoint.
What mind-boggling is that you'd trust to keep his word when he has flip-flopped and broken his word over and over again.
You're stupidity is dooming conservatism for EIGHT years instead of four.