Posted on 07/04/2012 1:16:13 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Well said.
I still don't agree with your tactics, but I suggest you pick a thread and repost it in the Religion Forum for more exposure.
I'm going to have fun watching you and Quix compete for bandwidth on TBL, especially since he has come out as a committed "911 truther".
Would it be pathetic not to vote for obama because you hate islam?
Or is that a rational choice?
Or is a choice not to vote for a liberal because they are a liberal (whether D or R) a rational choice regardless of their religion?
What is fascinating are the people who are absolutely convinced one can not be opposed to Romney’s record of liberalism, without being accused of hating mormons.
That sir is irrational.
You type faster than God.
LOL
Is this sarcasm? Why?
Bowed out with the comment, "YAY! FREE REPUBLIC.
I was really aiming to be member #500 but missed it by four.
Sorry Lake. Just as you have on every other thread, you stom your feet and act like that kid throwing himself on the floor kicking and screaming when mommy won’t buy you the candy bar.
The only ‘silliness’ is you trying to justify your shame in voting for a liberal. That is something anyone with a sense of morality, decency, right and wrong cannot do. And let’s not forget YOU came HERE. YOU don’t get to exercise your liberal instincts and direct where I post. And if you were to not rrepond at all, here or anywhere else on FR, that would suit many of us just fine.
I suppose you think that Palin, Newt, Santorum, Perry, Rush, Levin, and virtually every other conservative you have once expressed great admiration and support for has lost their sense of morality, decency and ability to discern right from wrong too.....doesn't say much for your judgment Normy......
Of course Norm IS THE ONLY ONE who has kept his purity.
Congrats. You're just so, you know....irrelevant....pure.
:-)
I repeat Lake, YOU came HERE. If I were so mindless, I’d think the smart thing to do would be to ignore me.
But you just keep coming. I wonder why that is? And why do you ping me to your Count of Sesame Street threads?
AH! I get it! Logic is thrown out the window when voting for a liberal becomes one’s Holy Grail. I understand now!
LOL ... that’s funny, but I wouldn’t bet on that ... :-)
AND ALSO FOR ALL ... just to note this from that other site ... the admins there will help you reserve and keep your name - so that no one else uses it to your detriment.
You don’t have to participate there. They just don’t want anyone to use your name and get you falsely accused of anything!
http://www.trueblueliberty.com/index.php?topic=13396.0
But you just don't, because you can't.
Thanks ... and I will take your suggestion and do that. I’ll set up a thread to itself - and hopefully that will do it. Probably later on tonight ... :-)
— — — — —
Oh ... about the 9/11 Truthers ... since I deal with Islam and Sharia Law a lot —and — since the public awareness of the dangers of this totalitarian and oppressive and violent IDEOLOGY was heightened after the 9/11 attacks ... I feel no need to “let Osama bin Laden off the hook” with his responsibility for this and sidetrack people’s attention away from the dangers of this backward, retarded and violent ideology - by making up (or perpetrating) false stories about the USA (and/or the Jews and the Mossad) DOING IT - and thus framing bin Laden to make it look like he did it.
These 9/11 Truthers say that Osama bin Laden is innocent. He didn’t have anything to do with it. That’s ridiculous and he had everything to do with it, along with several others that worked with him, too.
And when I deal with Geert Wilders (on his page on Facebook) and this topic comes up, it’s just shut down and deleted. There’s simply NO DISCUSSION OF IT AT ALL. We won’t entertain it. Our attitude is to let others entertain themselves with it - if they want - but not with those of us who are fighting against this totalitarian, oppressive, violent and murderous ideology of Islam and Sharia Law - pushed on us by Islamists and Jihadists!
SO ... all that to say ... I don’t think it’s worth it to go into it with anyone who takes that position, and I basically don’t, but simply ignore that sort of explanation. And that means you won’t find me diving in the middle of all that, to argue against the 9/11 Truthers. We simply maintain what we know is true - go with that - and ignore the conspiracy theories.
I don’t care who it is ... if it’s a close relative, a good friend, a kid of mine, co-worker, a boss, or whomever — I’ll simply tell them, “Tell it to someone else and not to me. I won’t talk about that and that’s the end of the story for me!”
Now, in Quix’s case, I did write a personal note to him, explained my position - more from a Biblical stance, as he understands where I’m coming from, too - and simply left it at that.
I may engage on some other topics that are talked about (especially in the Christian sphere and with Genesis 6, and the book of Revelation and the Anti-Christ - in general — but I won’t go into that. Therefore, past my personal note to Quix - you won’t find me engaging in any such talks over there on this subject (aside from perhaps an occasional or periodic explaining that I won’t talk about it).
— — — — —
And let me say one more thing about that - and in relation to why I would bother talking about “false doctrines” and “false teachings” in the religious area - and NOT TALK about the 9/11 Truther conspiracy.
It’s actually pretty simple, really. No matter what one thinks or speculates on or maintains on the 9/11 attack - nothing there impinges on one’s PERSONAL SALVATION. You can think one way, or another way, or be as nutty as you want - and still Salvation is a separate issue from that.
But, when someone talks about false doctrines and false teachings that tie DIRECTLY INTO SALVATION and “who” the Savior is and “what secures salvation” - and how one can lose their SOUL and be ETERNALLY DAMNED in the lake of fire - that’s something that MUST BE TALKED ABOUT ... or one is simply contributing to throwing other people’s lives away.
Okay ... that’s about it ... :-)
Try harder Lake. For those of us with principle, I make perfect sense. Again, explain to the class how voting for a liberal means you are ‘really’ a conservative.
Come on Lake, if you are so convinced of my stupidity, you can come up with something better than “The alternative is worse’. The Alternative may be ‘worse’ depending on how you look at it but it STILL isn’t in any way shape or form ‘conservative’.
I know your guilt drives you to come on these threads and try hopelessly to justify your decision to not only campaign for a liberal, but harangue anyone whose ethics are not as ‘situational’ as your own, but SURELY you can point to a logical reason to claim that a vote for the most liberal Republican ever put up bu the GOP is a ‘Conservative’ thin to do. Hint: Voting for a liberal is NEVER a conservative thing to do, no matter what twists of language you invent.
So try again. Or better, don’t. The only thing you are convincing anyone of is that you’ll vote for a lib any time you get scared.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.