I read the article.
And in the accompanying headline, you imply Weiner is a rapist.
Try selling any other interpretation of that headline to an educated jury of native English speakers.
It’s shameful. Surprised the moderator hasn’t pulled this thread.
Let me simplify, since this is apparently so complicated.
1.) I never said or implied Weiner is a rapist. The headline is about Huma’s mother condoning the behavior, regardless of Weiner’s actions.
2.) Huma’s mother is a leader in the Muslim Sisterhood (how about you ask yourselves why she has no problem with her daughter marrying a Jew?)
3.) Huma’s mother supports IICWC, a group that supports marital rape (just like anyone who supports planned parenthood must support abortion)
4.) Therefore, how is Huma’s mother not a hypocrite if she has a problem with her daughter being raped by Weiner?
You people are having a difficult time with logic today.