Posted on 07/03/2012 1:43:55 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch
What’s her contention? That the angels arrived too late to actually guard the people while they were still alive, so they contented themselves with guarding the wreckage? Guarding it from what exactly? Were the angels there to shoot looters?
There were bodies at both sites. Why post that rubbish?
I believe the first few days after the attacks, there still were many questions in the minds of family members and loved ones regarding the events which had transpired and the location of their loved ones.
I wouldn’t be surprised if multiple prayers were sent out worldwide for a legion of angels to watch over loved ones until events were under control.
We also know that some territorial angels, though dispatched, might be hindered by adversarial spiritual domains and might not have arrived until too late, simply posted until further directed by legitimate authority.
Such are plausible explanations, but neither have adequate information to suggest they are the legitimate explanation for their presence, as it might not be any of our business.
If the report is true, then some reason for the occurrence fits in His Plan.
It isn’t uncommon for high speed air crashes for nothing to remain after the crash. Same thing happens with high explosives packed around a target. The target simply vaporizes with nothing visible left after the explosion.
Many airplane crashes are subsequent to slow and crash land the aircraft, or to pull out of a dive, not quite making the maneuver. In those situations, a large debris field may be visible.
LOL, slick.
High speed air crashes going at the speed of debris from high explosives packed around a target?
Give an example of such a thing.
Yeah, slick indeed.
Did I ever tell you about the cold wind that was like liquid nitrogen?
Or the stove that got as hot as an arc welder?
Or the shoes that were as heavy as the anchor of an aircraft carrier?
No?
Ask me some time.
I’m asking.
BTW, what happens when you pack eight 500lb slicks around a heavily armored limousine (one in the back seat, one in the front, one under the block, one under the front axle, one under the rear axle, one on the roof, one on the trunk, and one on the hood.) and light ‘em off with det cord and a slow fuse?
Could only find a fist sized piece of the drive shaft about 2 miles away afterwards,...if that actually came from the same blast....
I fully expected to find a chasis or engine block. Nothing left but glazed sand.
PS...you didn’t happen to serve of the USS Eldridge did you? ;^)
OK, Sport: Did we land on the moon in 1969? Did we stop going after Apollo 17?
So she's lying?
Just because she didn’t see bodies doesn’t mean there were no human remains at the site. That’s bad logic.
Apparently, for it seems to have occurred at two places on the same day.
In 1993, near Pittsburgh Pa, a flight went down with about 100 people on board. There were almost zero remains identifiable as bodies or parts.
You don't think she was looking then? And that's good logic?
PSA 1771 also.
Your boxed dumbass comments should be outlawed.
Are you implying that these aircraft had no one on board and were crashed via remote?
|
|
Give you $20 bucks...to stop posting in a box.
|
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.