Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

No!

There seems to be a silver lining in what Roberts actually did. I don’t think he did this to benefit Obamacare at all. I think he realized that if he threw it out, the democrats were going to push harder to get this legislation passed. What Roberts did was left it to the states.

Look at what the states are doing.... Many are not going to abide by it. The House is ready to bring it back to the House and repeal it as now it is a tax and not a penalty. They will have many democrats on their side since many are up for re-election. I think we need to just watch this! He also gave the government in no uncertain terms that they were not allowed to use the commerce clause in this manner - its a flat out tax. This makes Obama a liar in chief. This is payback time for Roberts.

He thought long and hard about this decision - lets give it time to fully sink in. I don’t think we should be going for his head at this time. He may have just saved us.

I have pretty strong feelings about this. There is something there that he did that definitely was not in BO’s favor.


16 posted on 07/02/2012 7:54:00 PM PDT by jcsjcm (This country was built on exceptionalism and individualism. In God we Trust - Laus Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jcsjcm

Oh, yeah, the “silver lining”, or as they say, received ideas (Krauthammer, Will, et al. Yawn!) And Mr Roberts was so devilishly clever that he fooled those 4 liberals on the court, and they still don’t know better and will never know what hit ‘em.


28 posted on 07/02/2012 8:03:31 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: jcsjcm

well...another thought...he should resign??? and the supreme court should disolve...why? because chief justice roberts, in my mind, seems to prefer the voters to make decisions, he explained he felt the need to defer to the masses/voters (lord help us)...so should the voters then decide all issues???? if so, where does the supreme court come into play?

roberts indicates they are irrelevant???


38 posted on 07/02/2012 8:11:06 PM PDT by formoversubstance (formoversubstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: jcsjcm
IMO, Roberts made a huge mistake - he tried to outplay the Left at their own game when he should have voted to make their game illegal. Roberts should have considered that Adolf Hitler's rise to totalitarian power in Weimer Germany was almost entirely 'legal', bolstered by weak kneed actions such as Roberts' in his 0bamacare vote.

Instead, Roberts tried to make the Left's case for them in a way that he thought was slightly compatible with conservative ideals. Problem is, the Left is composed almost entirely of such unscrupulous liars and revisionists that they shouldn't have much trouble obscuring or otherwise getting around the fact that 0bamacare is primarily a government power grab pack of tax increases which they are fundamentally for, anyway.

39 posted on 07/02/2012 8:12:01 PM PDT by Post Toasties (Leftists give insanity a bad name. 0bama: Four years of failure and fingerpointing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: jcsjcm
IMO, Roberts made a huge mistake - he tried to outplay the Left at their own game when he should have voted to make their game illegal. Roberts should have considered that Adolf Hitler's rise to totalitarian power in Weimer Germany was almost entirely 'legal', bolstered by weak kneed actions such as Roberts' in his 0bamacare vote.

Instead, Roberts tried to make the Left's case for them in a way that he thought was slightly compatible with conservative ideals. Problem is, the Left is composed almost entirely of such unscrupulous liars and revisionists that they shouldn't have much trouble obscuring or otherwise getting around the fact that 0bamacare is primarily a government power grab pack of tax increases which they are fundamentally for, anyway.

40 posted on 07/02/2012 8:12:26 PM PDT by Post Toasties (Leftists give insanity a bad name. 0bama: Four years of failure and fingerpointing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: jcsjcm
There seems to be a silver lining in what Roberts actually did. I don’t think he did this to benefit Obamacare at all. I think he realized that if he threw it out, the democrats were going to push harder to get this legislation passed. What Roberts did was left it to the states.

So he deserves credit for upholding an unconstitutional bill by concocting a convoluted opinion that was so tortured and absurd that Justices Alito, Kennedy, Thomas and Scalia declined to sign it?

I don't think so.

45 posted on 07/02/2012 8:15:33 PM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: jcsjcm
Given the fact that obamaKKKare mixes private and public funds it's possible the cash flow from the new taxes in the mix are routed in such a way that it doesn't go to the Treasury as is required in the Constitution.

It's worth taking a look at the bill ~ we have a few months when it is still legal (before it's repealed) so we might find out who is stealing what!

You just know it's going on with this crowd.

76 posted on 07/02/2012 9:05:07 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson