Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sequoyah101; Deagle

John Roberts interpreted not the Constitution, in regard to this law, but rather he took the legislation language of the law, dismissed it, and deemed it to his own satisfaction, in order to pass the dang thing.

Where was it we saw that done, before?


66 posted on 07/01/2012 10:34:00 PM PDT by RitaOK (NO ROMNEY, NO COMPROMISE. NO WAY. NO HOW. NOT NOW. NOT EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: RitaOK

Abortion comes to mind. Just another overreach of the Courts.


67 posted on 07/01/2012 10:37:00 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: RitaOK

Yep, well put.

We have seemed to lose the scholars necessary to both read and interpret the Constitution as written.

That means that our education has failed us severely (probably so) and that common sense seems to be a failure of our leaders. The major problem is does that mean that the voters are getting so dumb that they can not elect decent leaders or does that mean that the leaders running for office are so dumb (as to the actual Constitution) that it does not matter who we elect?

I suggest the latter.


68 posted on 07/01/2012 10:43:38 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson