Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ModelBreaker
I don't know about that - Roberts said it was a tax - the Constitutionality of that tax would have to be determined AFTER someone pays the tax (penalty) and has standing to challenge it.

Taxes already reward or penalize activity or non-activity. Having a child is a choice, marriage is a choice, buying a home and paying a mortgage is a choice - all involve particular tax benefits or penalties.

Not that I agree - I think equal protection under the law means that we should all pay at the same rate - currently around 18% IIRC - no matter our particular circumstances. But I don't write our tax laws, or get to rule on their Constitutionality.

And under our system - someone has to PAY the tax before they have standing to challenge the tax. Not sure I agree with that either - but it is what it is.

151 posted on 06/28/2012 12:17:27 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream

“Taxes already reward or penalize activity or non-activity. Having a child is a choice, marriage is a choice, buying a home and paying a mortgage is a choice - all involve particular tax benefits or penalties”

Yes, and that’s a big plus in favor of the flat tax. But nevermind, there’s something else involved here. It’s not just that they tax married couples and mortgage payers different than single people and renters or outright homeowners. Now they’re explicitly ordering you to buy insurance and threatening you with a penalty if you don’t.

That’s different than different rates for different behavior.


156 posted on 06/28/2012 12:22:49 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson