Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Borax Queen
“Yes, you heard right, vaccines from aborted children.”

Once again, for those of you from Rio Linda, vaccines are not “made” from aborted “children”; they do not contain the dead remains, the tissues of numerous aborted children. In fact it is not necessary for any abortion performed since or even up to today to add to those original fetal cell lines, obtained in the early 1960’s. The viruses are indeed grown in those cell lines as some virus replications need a human cell growth medium in order to produce and replicate the inert virus that makes up some vaccines, at least until a viable alternative is found, which I hope will be found but in the meantime, there is no alternative for some, and they are used for just that, as a cellular grown medium. But understand that the vaccines are not “made” from and do not contain the tissues of numerous aborted children, if even any tissues or any DNA from the original two aborted children are in those vaccinations, which is very doubtful. And if you took the time to learn and understand what the effects of injecting unmatched human tissues directly into another person would cause (and it’s not Autism BTW) you would understand why any such “vaccine” would be fatal to nearly all who received it.

The cell lines in use for the last 30+ years where indeed and without question or dispute, obtained from aborted fetuses (yes, sad, tragic and immoral as to the reason the mothers aborted) but the two cell lines from those two fetuses aborted over 30 years ago have been replicated over and over again for over 30 years and those two human cell lines are the ones used for the replication of inert viruses used in some vaccinations. Out of something so bad and so wrong, at least something good has come from it. YMMV.

If you find a moral objection to having your kids vaccinated against Rubella, Mumps, Chicken Pox, etc.; fine, and more power to you – that’s your right. But then by all means, do the right thing and keep you and your kids away from all others, especially member of my family and pregnant women if your kids have Rubella and stay in complete isolation and deal with the devastating effects of those very preventable diseases within your own family and do us all a favor and not spread your “moral” diseases to others. And if your kid is bitten by a rabid animal and you find it morally objectionable to have your kid receive the rabies vaccine, by all means do so. And by all means get back to us and tell us how that worked out for you and your dead child. And if you think Polio is something you’d have no problem with your kids contracting, go for it.

149 posted on 06/25/2012 9:39:49 AM PDT by MD Expat in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: MD Expat in PA; yank in the UK
"If you find a moral objection to having your kids vaccinated against Rubella, Mumps, Chicken Pox, etc.; fine, and more power to you – that’s your right. But then by all means, do the right thing and keep you and your kids away from all others, especially member of my family and pregnant women if your kids have Rubella and stay in complete isolation and deal with the devastating effects of those very preventable diseases within your own family and do us all a favor and not spread your “moral” diseases to others.

One question. If you believe vaccines are effective and confer immunity, why would you need to fear the unvaccinated? Theoretically, according to your beliefs, the unvaccinated should only be able to infect each other.

159 posted on 06/27/2012 12:42:14 PM PDT by My hearts in London - Everett (Gingrich or bust! (5/7/12, I guess it's bust.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson