re: “Heinrich Himmler would be a lesser evil in this cycle. His malevolent genocide was aimed at a smaller segment of humanity and he actually brought some measure of military experience. I wouldn’t vote for him either.”
So you really think Romney is worse than Himmler? I don’t even know what to say to that. Romney is practicing and advocating malevolent genocide? I get the pro-choice thing making him complicit in abortion, but genocide?
The point is the race is between Obama - total 110% pro-abortion (even to killing babies who survive abortion) - and Romney - who is maybe 40% pro-abortion. Not good, but better than 110%
Obama is for total governmental control of business at worst and crony capitalism at best - total union - tax all Americans up the Wazoo - no business experience at all nor even concerned about economics that promote business (it’s irrelevant to him). Obama loves abortion, he loves preferential minority treatment, he hates capitalism, he hates Christianity, he has no regard for personal property rights, 2nd amendment rights, freedom of religion, plus, on top of all that he hates the United States of American and everything upon which it was founded.
That is not Romney. He wasn’t the guy I wanted, but that’s our choices. How can anyone not vote for him - at least we have a marginal chance at survival. With Obama there is no chance - with Romney a chance. Who do I vote for?? It’s a no-brainer.
Yes, Romney is supposed to be a Mormon. And, yes, Mormonism is a not an orthodox Christian denomination - it is regarded as a cult by orthodox Christians. But, do you really think Romney is out to turn the United States into a Mormon theocracy?? That would be some trick. We can barely even talk about God in public let alone establish a religious theocracy of any religious group (other than global warmists).
I see our country as an airliner whose pilot is either drunk or dead and we’re going down fast. If no one else on the plane can fly the plane but this one guy - would you care what religion he was or whether you agreed with him on every political subject? I doubt it. You would just want him to fly that plane straight and level and try to get it out of trouble. Sure, it may still go down, but if you are on that plane you want it to stay safely in the air as long as possible - you want to survive as long as you can because the alternative is death.
I don’t have to tell anyone here on this site what danger our nation is in. We all know we are in serious, serious trouble. If the only choices are (a) 100% awful, no chance of survival, and (b) 50% awful, some chance of survival - we go with less evil, more good than the other, more chance of survival.
If, on the other hand, you want to sit on your principles at and feel superior you didn’t “fall” for voting for less evil thing - great. Have at it.
P.S. Himmler was hardly a military expert. He was in training (boot-camp) when WW1 ended. He never saw combat at all. He was simply a Nazi political hack who believed in wacko “super-race” eugenics.
Romney is the guy who jammed the landing gear. Doesn’t really matter if he is at the controls when the plane crashes ~ it won’t land!
“So you really think Romney is worse than Himmler? I don’t even know what to say to that. Romney is practicing and advocating malevolent genocide? I get the pro-choice thing making him complicit in abortion, but genocide?”
At the time Willard was promulgating discounted, state subsidized abortions in Massachusetts for everyone else, he was discouraging abortions amongst his coreligionists. So yes, I would say he has a Margaret Sanger kind of agenda of his own.
Heinrich’s malice was directed principally at Jews, Slavs, the Romani and others who were not welcome in the NSDAP world view. It was a -relatively- short target list of innocent victims, and is sufficient to make him an infamous monster. Willard’s culture of death angle is much wider however, and would seem to encompass all but his own tiny group. Hussein’s list of victims is wide open, with no holds barred. So, looking at the culture of death as a pie, Heinrich took a large slice. Willard takes all but about 97% of the pie, and leaves only a small sliver. Hussein eats the whole thing. If an authority promulgates liquidating people as policy, that authority is genocidal, whether it is 30% of the population, 97% or 100%.
“P.S. Himmler was hardly a military expert. He was in training (boot-camp) when WW1 ended. He never saw combat at all. He was simply a Nazi political hack who believed in wacko “super-race” eugenics.”
I never called Heinrich a military expert. I said he brought *something* to the table. Neither Hussein nor Willard have. Heinrich a political hack? Absolutely. And Willard and Hussein are not? You know that is precisely what they are. Wacko? Certainly. And?
“If, on the other hand, you want to sit on your principles at and feel superior you didn’t “fall” for voting for less evil thing - great. Have at it.”
That is exactly what I will do. When the relative evils are GREAT evils, I will pass on all of them. There is a depth of depravity that is not to be encouraged or supported. I am under no obligation to throw support to Elagabalus, Nero or Diocletian or to burn incense to any Caesar. No decent person is.
Here is the fact of the matter: In November, the great majority of Americans will cast their ballots for a fringe, deceitful, culture of death charlatan to lead them; a charlatan whose family at one point or another turned their backs on America, whether to seek their pleasures at an Indonesian madrasa or a Mexican chicken ranch. Which of these charlatans wins is not really that significant. That the American people as a whole will have signified their assent to such governance WILL be significant. The rot is deep. Let the crumbling begin.