Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: pabianice

Following that logic, then all the Clinton prosperity was due to Reagan’s supply side economics.


5 posted on 06/15/2012 7:09:10 AM PDT by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: shibumi

Actually, shibumi, it *was.*

Read “the 7 fat years” by robert bartley.


20 posted on 06/15/2012 7:18:25 AM PDT by sauropod (You can elect your very own tyranny - Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: shibumi

That is the real truth though. Liberals made fun of Reagans Ideas at the time, but when Clinton rode Reagans economy for 8 years before he crashed the market the liberals to this day say Clinton is the best president of the last 1000 years. I say Nay Nay. Clinton was in the right place at the right time. Had Bush Sr been elected the economy would have done the exact same thing. But the market would have never crashed. Well maybe with Bush Sr getting punked around by the racist liberals.


40 posted on 06/15/2012 7:50:10 AM PDT by crazydad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: shibumi
Following that logic, then all the Clinton prosperity was due to Reagan’s supply side economics.

LOL

If it weren't for the toxic MSM double standard you'd be right... But the day after Romney's elected, the economic problems caused by Obama will ALL be Romney's his fault.

Those of you who don't hate the MSM yet are not paying attention...

47 posted on 06/15/2012 8:10:19 AM PDT by GOPJ (Take your little hammer, little sickle and your scary red signs with a fist on it, and go home...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson