[Texas Songwriter]

"Does the scientist assume that reason will guide him to a correct understanding? No. He knows it.

Take a careful look at what you say. Take a look at your series of tautologies.

Tell you what. I will let the reader of your post and my posts stand in stark contrast to each other.

It is hard to resist not commenting on your statement that "science is based on Bayesian probability". That is a remarkable statement. I will let it go at that. It is not important I rejoin such a statement. I will let the reader make an assessment. It is unsetteling to know that science, according to you, does not rely on logic.

Good luck.

[spunkets]

"It is unsetteling to know that science, according to you, does not rely on logic."

You missed something.

Re: "Science is based on Bayesian probability."

That is a remarkable statement. ... It is not important I rejoin such a statement.

It should learn it though.