Let’s make this simple, since our discussion is devolving to discussing things only tangential to the original dispute. You seem to have a problem with the word God, so let’s simply talk about supernatural vs natural phenomenon. I’ll rephrase my original point as an either/or proposition, so there should be no confusion or need to argue semantics.
Either:
A. It is within the scope of science to demonstrate evidence of the supernatural.
or
B. It is not within the scope of science to demonstrate evidence of the supernatural.
Pick one or the other, no arguing semantics or dancing around the issue. I pick B.
Which supernatural, pink elephants, or little greys?
"B. It is not within the scope of science to demonstrate evidence of the supernatural.
Science doesn't generate, or demonstrate evidence for something. Either it's observable, or it's not.
"Pick one or the other, no arguing semantics or dancing around the issue. I pick B."
:)