Is Dark Matter a Glimpse of a Deeper Level of Reality?

Scientific American ^ | 6/11/12 | George Musser

[Doc Savage]

Sheldon Cooper disproved this theory in 1998.

[cuban leaf]

Funny you should mention EM force...

http://www.amazon.com/Pushing-Gravity-Perspectives-Theory-Gravitation/dp/0968368972

[MWestMom]

I’m waiting for someone to explain that guy’s hair.

[UCANSEE2]

Now, why do people park in driveways and drive on parkways?

Why do you only use your emergency brake when the car is not running, and safely parked ?

[UCANSEE2]

uno mas.

Why , when you ask someone how FAR away something is, they tell you how long it takes to get there?

[UCANSEE2]

Michael Crichton said so in Timeline.

He wrote that book? Dang, I must be in the wrong timeline.

See Ya ( maybe ).

[UCANSEE2]

My head hurts.

I can fix that, if you'll just look here...

[from occupied ga]

for the same reason that time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana

[from occupied ga]

for the same reason that time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana

[UCANSEE2]

Silly me. I thought this was already answered.

[UCANSEE2]

You are right, they cannot admit He exists,

I don't think that is the problem. Most scientists believe in God.

They are merely trying to understand how he did it.

[OneVike]

I understand what you are sating, but what you fail to realize is thatthe dark matter the scientists are speaking of does not exist. They even admit they cannot prove it exists and that you need faith that it does.

So I am not saying Christ is anything he created, because what they claim exists does not.

taken to the logical conclusion, they are looking for the one thing that holds all things together. They call it dark matter. In truth what they are looking for is Christ as Hebrews 1:1-4 explains. So my analogy was that Christ is the dark matter they are looking for.

I am not saying Christ is a creation, when He is in effect THE Creator.

I hope that clears up the misunderstanding. I have no better way to express that what I say is exactly what you believe. So we are saying the same thing. My original statement was put in a way to open their eyes, not yours.

You could say I did what Paul did when he used the statue to the unknown god to explain the true God to them. Paul was not saying God was a creation as the unknown god was, but instead unknown to them because their eyes and minds were closed to the truth.

[UCANSEE2]

Our space/time reality floating around on and the results of a more basic reality with not necessarily the same laws of physics..........I could go for that.

Even if we thought we were the center of the Universe , and everything was created just for us, what difference would it make?

[UCANSEE2]

Problem is, to push it depends on some sort of as-yet undetected “ether”.

Like quantum foam. The ground floor of atomic movement? The "ohmmmmmmmmm' that God continuously utters that is the basis for the existence of matter and energy?

[OneVike]

I would like to think most scientists are like Copernicus and other early scientist who studied the creation to understand the Creator, but alas, I disagree.

By far and large the vast majority do Not believe in the God of the Bible, the One and Only true God. Their god is much too small to create the world in 6 days, let alone create man without some sort of evolution.

If the true God who cannot lie, lied about the number of days and how he created us, then He is not a true God. Their god is much, much too small to be the same as my God.

[UCANSEE2]

They why are gravity wells like dimples in the fabric of space time?

You should see it from the other side.

[Errant]

You recommending? :)

I checked out the reviews and from them, the author must cite evidence that the inverse square law applies to both? Many forces in God's universe share that characteristic. I may have to download it on kindle, sounds interesting.

Thanks,

[Errant]

The "ohmmmmmmmmm' As in wave frequency, IMO. The continuous nature is certainly just one of the many of God's mysteries yet to be revealed... ;)

[Errant]

You should see it from the other side.

LOL, Maybe we are!

[Errant]

They are merely trying to understand how he did it.

I agree that the really smart ones are/were.