“A landmark study on Hiroshima survivors comprehensively disproves nuclear lobby spin about ionising radiation being safe at low doses. Noel Wauchope reports.”
I’ve only gotten through this first sentence...but when I read something like this, I immediately DISCREDIT the source.
BEIR VII report has a similar sentence in their report. It’s something like ‘contrary to what the nuclear industry would like to believe...’ and it’s there because the medical community seems to be frustrated by the way that the nuke industry has commandeered, or tried to, the reporting of medical consensus. Nuke shills HAVE to claim BEIR VII and all other medical reports are biased or lack credibility because it says things they don’t want to hear - it points to their liability to the public and if there’s anything nuke apologists will never accept, is accountability for their actions. So - yes you discredit medical reports you don’t like. I am not surprised.