[WWTraveler]

The report is fine. The problem comes with the “Review of the Report” by an outsider Ian Goddard. The man draws conclusions from nothing. This report is not about “low levels of radiation”, but the radiation effects on the survivors in these cities between 1950 and 2003. This is the 14th report. It really does not provide any thing new.

[mountainlion]

The people should examine a control group of non exposed persons to show the effects. Reports like this need to be studied by experts and not take bad looking parts out of context. I saw that 0% of the people 50 and had survived. That looks bad until you think that someone 50 years old would be 117 years old now.