Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ruesrose

Life is unsafe and if he is worried there is a cure.

True. Any affliction is just temporary until we die.

________________________________________________________

So....let’s just let incompetent nuclear industry management continue without comment? We address elective risk based on information but you don’t like that? We should just ‘die’ if we object to nuclear industry incompetence and misinformation? What other industries should we allow to abuse the public interest without comment? Which industries should be allowed to pollute the environment and condescend to us if we object?


10 posted on 06/13/2012 11:37:40 AM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

if tshtf what happens when we can keep all those nuclear plants running.....


11 posted on 06/13/2012 11:42:51 AM PDT by freedommom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

So....let’s just let incompetent nuclear industry management continue without comment

I didn’t say that. I agreed there was a cure..that any affliction is tempory until we die. It’s like coughing or bleeding. Eventually they stop.
I live near the Savannah River Site and I know many people who have died or are dying of cancer. The majority of them worked at SRS. If there is a cure no one is bothering to cure them.


18 posted on 06/13/2012 12:04:24 PM PDT by ruesrose (It's possible to be clueless without being blonde.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
So....let’s just let incompetent nuclear industry management continue without comment?

Perhaps not. But there is a larger problem. Humankind needs power. But all that power that we get is in some way dirty. Nuclear is self-explanatory. Hydro kills huge lands and little fishes. Coal is radioactive and mining destroys lands, and all that smoke is not good for us either. Oil is getting harder to obtain. Solar is not energy-efficient, and semiconductor manufacturing is very poisonous. What do we have left?

There is an alternative, though. We can reduce our energy consumption. But if we do so then we have to reduce the population as well, since primitive farming (with animals for motive force) will not be able to feed 6+ billion people, especially when majority of them will have no jobs. We don't even have enough arable land for 6 billion newly minted peasants. Humans are alive and well today largely because modern intensive agriculture can feed us.

Without energy modern medicine will cease to be. We will be thrown back into middle ages where a horse was the best vehicle you could hope for. Plague and other maladies would become commonplace without proper sanitation (that requires energy.)

I don't want to say that TEPCO and their ilk should be allowed to do whatever they want, unchecked. However it's not enough to say "this won't work" - we need to have a plan, a list of things that will work. I haven't seen such a plan yet - a plan, at least, that does not decimate the population.

Besides, let's assume for the moment that we let 9/10 of the people to die off. The survivors go back into caves. But is such a life worth it? You probably will live longer near Fukushima than in a cave far away from it. The first cold winter, pneumonia, no antibiotics, and you are done for. A newborn's chance of survival would be also pretty low. But Gaia would be happy, I guess.

22 posted on 06/13/2012 12:15:22 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson