Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Australian coroner confirms dingo killed baby in 1980
Los Angeles Times ^ | June 11, 2012, 9:39 p.m. | (From the Associated Press)

Posted on 06/11/2012 11:12:26 PM PDT by Olog-hai

Settling a notorious 1980 case that split the nation and led to a mistaken murder conviction, an Australian coroner ruled Tuesday that a dingo took a baby from a campsite in the Outback, just as her mother said from the beginning.

The eyes of Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton and her ex-husband, Michael Chamberlain, welled with tears as the findings of the fourth inquest into the disappearance of their 9-week-old daughter, Azaria, were announced in court. Lindy Chamberlain served more than three years in prison for the baby's death, but was later cleared and has always maintained that a wild dog took her.

"We're relieved and delighted to come to the end of this saga," a tearful but smiling Chamberlain-Creighton told reporters outside the court in the northern city of Darwin.

Azaria disappeared from a campsite near Ayers Rock, the red monolith in the Australian desert now known by its Aboriginal name Uluru. The case became famous internationally through the 1988 movie "A Cry in the Dark."

Many Australians initially did not believe that a dingo was strong enough to take away the baby. Public opinion swayed harshly against the couple; some even spat on Chamberlain-Creighton and howled like dingoes outside her house.

No similar dingo attack had been documented at the time, but in recent years the wild dogs have been blamed for three fatal attacks on children. Few doubt the couple's story today, but the latest inquest—which the family had fought to get—made it official that Azaria was killed in a dingo attack. …

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; History; Pets/Animals; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: acryinthedark; australia; chamberlaincreighton; dingo; dingoatebaby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: Vaquero

Sorry, maybe I was having too much fun!!!


21 posted on 06/12/2012 7:43:13 AM PDT by Colorado Cowgirl (God bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
And even more importantly, never underestimate the will and determination of a prosecutor hell bent on conviction, facts be damned.

There are more than a few. Because of the position they hold, I believe if prosecutors are found to be corrupt or blatantly ignore the facts, they should be subject to life in prison with absolutely no chance of parole.

In addition, they should have 100% of their assets seized, even if it means throwing their family onto the streets.

There is very little that is more evil than people in such public positions of sacred trust, being corrupt and corrosive to the rule of law.

22 posted on 06/12/2012 9:24:20 AM PDT by sand88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson