Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip

I didn’t see any of the three judge’s score a 117 - 111 for anyone. Judge Jerry Roth had it 115-113 for Pacquiao, but C.J. Ross (the woman) and Duane Ford both scored it 115-113 for Bradley.

ESPN.com had it 119-109 for Pacquiao. HBO’s unofficial judge, Harold Lederman, also had it 119-109 for Pacquiao, meaning he gave Bradley only one round. Most ringside media also scored it clearly for Pacquiao.


20 posted on 06/10/2012 11:10:59 AM PDT by Beave Meister (Die Hard Cubs Fan.....if it takes forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Beave Meister
My mistake. I misread this sentence in the above article:

"The Associated Press had Pacquiao winning 117-111."

21 posted on 06/10/2012 11:26:34 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister
HBO’s unofficial judge, Harold Lederman, also had it 119-109 for Pacquiao, meaning he gave Bradley only one round. Most ringside media also scored it clearly for Pacquiao.

Most ringside media also have a vested interest in Pacquiao's remaining undefeated and fighting Mayweather. Boxing is a subjective sport which means things like what happened tonight can happen. A boxer with Pacquiao's experience knows that and should have made it so there was no doubt in anybody's mind, which he didn't do.

Remember that there are many people who believe the same thing that happened to Pacquiao via Bradly happened to Marquez via Pacquiao. This is probably why the person complaining the least about the decision is Manny.

24 posted on 06/10/2012 7:58:44 PM PDT by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson