Not quite. Think of it this way, certain animals are worth more alive than the people who would kill them. Would a person be justified in killing a person who was attempting to kill a champion racehorse or prized breeding bull? If you walked into your paddock or barn and saw a man with a gun to the head of either of those animals, would you be justified in killing him? You may argue that you would, given the concept of personal property and your right to protect it. But does the state have the right and responsibility to protect the people’s resources by what ever means necessary? And when those resources are as limited as tigers, shouldn’t the action to protect them be vigorous?
Tigers are few because they eat people. Americans cheering for the tigers is not unnoticed in the Second, Third, and Turd World areas.
Can you say “Ugly American”?
Try - you can do it. See! It didn’t hurt all that much did it?
;-)
Jokes aside, their land, their people being eaten by tigers. And, the Anglosphere chappies took away all their guns. How do you think they feel about being poor, weaponless, and knowing tigers eat lots of Indians every year?
Just wonderin’.