Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney and Palin

Posted on 05/25/2012 3:08:27 PM PDT by bsdsan

Each are Reaganest, in how they speak.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: backstabberromney; bravepalin; cowardlyromney; hatinpalin; honestpalin; liarromney; palin; palin4america; patriotpalin; pds; principledpalin; romney; romney4romney; romney4romneycare; romney4sharia; romney4tarp; romneydeception; romneyspew; shapeshifterromney; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: rodeo-mamma

What you wrote has no resemblance to the truth whatsoever. Palin’s contributions to the 2008 campaign kept the old fool from Arizona from being an unmitigated train wreck.

Going Rogue refers to her turning a deaf ear to the Romney Campaign retreads/now McCain Advisors that actively tried to sabotague both McCain and Palin.

Get help.


41 posted on 05/27/2012 8:52:50 PM PDT by Forty-Niner (The barely bare, berry bear formerly known as..........Ursus Arctos Horribilis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: citizen
(But there’s only one way to vote against Obama)\

Wrong.

42 posted on 05/28/2012 10:05:07 AM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma
Actually, Palin is the backstabber as I already said

You and the truth are strangers.

Mitt and his pukes, then, stabbed Sarah in the back and now they are at it again. You will never get real Conservatives to pull the lever for your masshole liberal Constitutionphobe by attacking Sarah. Attacking Conservatives only guarantees more defections to Conservative 3rd parties.

America needs Palin. It doesn't need mitt. Not at all. If you want the help of Conservatives then you might want to back off on attacking Palin and be thankful that we might still show up and vote for Republicans down the ballot.

43 posted on 05/28/2012 10:30:57 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (When we cease to be good we'll cease to be great. Be for Goode.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Forty-Niner

Yeah right, that’s what going Rogue was about, Romney? Then Palin needs help, cause not only was she the backstabber, but she declared war on Romney because she realized that he was a viable second runner, and she needed to destroy him to give herself a shot, as the failed VP backstabber who got caught. That woman is as devious as they come. She failed. Romney won. And Romney didn’t have to backstab McCain or write a book to blame someone else either for his failed plot, unlike Palin.


44 posted on 05/29/2012 7:04:53 PM PDT by rodeo-mamma (The ends don't justify the means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma

“Yeah right, that’s what going Rogue was about, Romney?”

No, the title was about, in part, former Romney staffers, now working for McCain’s campaign, their obvious attempts to discredit her, and her reaction to them. Their perfidy even extended beyond the 2008 Presidential season.

Meanwhile, Mitt himself kept his petticoats clean by using surrogates to sling the mud, and undermine the McCain/Palin campaign, just as he did throught the current primary season to the other Republican candidates. And Romneybots wonder why neither they, nor their man Mitt, are liked by Conservatives......

“....then Palin needs help, cause not only was she the backstabber...”

See my response above. Twist it all you want, but Romney and his campaign are slimey creatures and the backstabbing knives are theirs.

The rest of your post is just more of the same pure, unadulterated, BS.

Romney was, and still is, seriously upstaged by Sarah Palin as a charismatic political figure. He knows it, and has been at the forefront of a campaign to destroy her politically.....

Both Romneys, George and Mitt, had/have White House ambitions, something lacking in the Palin family history. He has not, and will not stop in his bid to realize that ambition..........Palin can, and has easily let that moment pass, So your logic does not follow.

It’s simply a case of Romney recognizing that Palin was a more sellable candidate than he, and using his considerable resources to make sure she was marginalized, and thereby eliminated as a potential opponet.

Easy enough to do...... the liberal left/MSM doesn’t like her either, and lent their support in that endeavor.

Besides, Romney, “We’re not returning to Reagan,” is not fond of conservative principals, or real Conservatives like Palin. So it was a two-fer for him.

If/when Romney wins the 2012 Presidention election it will be soley because of the citizens of these here United States choosing to take the WH away from Obama....nothing more or less....(ABO).... That Romney will be the recepiant of the national electorate’s desire to flush Obama, is the one and only reason he will be elected. Other than that he’d be a non-starter nationally.

Have you ever considered a position as a historical revisionist at an Liberal College/University? You should... You’re a natural talent! That said, let me add.... “You’re amazing!” /s


45 posted on 05/29/2012 9:44:43 PM PDT by Forty-Niner (The barely bare, berry bear formerly known as..........Ursus Arctos Horribilis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Forty-Niner

Nancy Reagan officially endorses Mitt Romney.

Nancy Reagan said that her late husband, Ronald Reagan, would have approved of a Romney presidency. “Ronnie would have liked Gov. Romney’s business background and his strong principles, and I have to say, I do, too,” Mrs. Reagan said in the statement. “I believe Mitt Romney has the experience and leadership skills that our country so desperately needs, and I look forward to seeing him elected president in November.”

Governor Mitt Romney and his wife, Ann, visited Former First Lady Nancy Reagan at her Los Angeles home on Thursday. The Republican presidential candidate has been campaigning and raising money on the West Coast this week.


46 posted on 06/01/2012 7:50:12 AM PDT by rodeo-mamma (The ends don't justify the means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma

Sounds like Nancy did a good job of reading the statement Romney provided her. LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Seriously, testimonials like this are merely one form of propaganda. Something Romney is good at. Mitt’s visit to the Reagan household was not to pay homage to someone that Romney is on record of disliking and disagreeing with, but a self serving mission of pushing his political agenda, I’m not impressed, uh-uh not one bit...his record proceeds him.

As far as I am concerned my attention is on electing a Conservative enough Congress so that Mitt can be dragged kicking and screaming into governing as a “real” (small c) conservative, not as his usual phoney baloney used car salesman Liberal-lite self. To attempt to wrap himself in the mantle of a genunine Big C Conservative illustrates Mitt’s continued attempts at chameleon-like conservative facade. ABO is major thing that will bouy Romney up in 2012. The whole thing (Romney) makes me sick.

You’re wasting your time trying to drum up any enthusium for your man Mitt among informed Conservatives. Mitt’s a mutt, one that is marginally better than Obama........ So saddle up and ride back out on those dusty trails rodeo-momma. “Boy, it’s a drag riding drag. (for Romney). Looking up the rear of a big ole steer, boy it’s a drag riding drag!”


47 posted on 06/01/2012 11:07:06 AM PDT by Forty-Niner (The barely bare, berry bear formerly known as..........Ursus Arctos Horribilis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Forty-Niner

Get over it, Romney’s a good man, he always have been, you just didn’t notice. I hope you notice now. Those words from Nancy were heartfelt. It would do you good to notice. I am sure Romney would be more then happy to get your vote.


48 posted on 06/01/2012 5:11:49 PM PDT by rodeo-mamma (The ends don't justify the means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson