Actually he’s correct. the psychology of contraception is consistent and foundational for acceptance of abortion. If it’s ok to prevent a child at stage X then why is it not ok at stage Y? it’s a classic slippery slope. The same sort of slope that soft porn to hard porn is...
That might apply to contraception methods that work post fertilization, but certainly not to those that prevent fertilization such as condoms. Sperm die by the millions daily in fertile males, with or without ejaculation.
Do you see any "slilppery slope" in banning it that leads to the destruction of the constitutional republic and estabishment of a theocracy to icsure proper enforcement?
So if a wife turns down her husband’s advances, it is a little like aborting an existing baby?