To: Red Badger
Ernest Lawrence, a pure experimentalist... said, "Don't you worry about it -- the theorists will find a way to make them all the same." -- Alvarez by Luis Alvarez (page 184)
I must reiterate my feeling that experimentalists always welcome the suggestions of the theorists. But the present situation is ridiculous... In my considered opinion the peer review system, in which proposals rather than proposers are reviewed, is the greatest disaster to be visited upon the scientific community in this century. No group of peers would have approved my building the 72-inch bubble chamber. Even Ernest Lawrence told me that he thought I was making a big mistake. He supported me because my track record was good. I believe U.S. science could recover from the stultifying effects of decades of misguided peer reviewing if we returned to the tried-and-true method of evaluating experimenters rather than experimental proposals. Many people will say that my ideas are elitist, and I certainly agree. The alternative is the egalitarianism that we now practice and that I've seen nearly kill basic science in the USSR and in the People's Republic of China. -- ibid (pp 200-201)
8 posted on
05/20/2012 8:40:50 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
Peer review can be the process of perpetuating the status quo. It can be a strangle hold on much true scientific advancement. I wonder how many awe inspiring advancements have been washed down it's too often conformist drains.
19 posted on
05/20/2012 10:40:13 PM PDT by
Bellflower
(The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson