Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: M1911A1
I’m hoping it never gets to trail. If it does, he should opt for a bench trail.

That might not be wise.It's easy to see why a judge might be afraid to render a "not guilty" for fear of the consequences to him/herself or family.Or,if judges in that jurisdiction are elected that *too* could present huge problems for Zimmerman.What the defense should demand is that jurors be allowed to remain entirely anonymous as is done in some Mafia trials.

5 posted on 05/19/2012 8:10:46 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Julia: another casualty of the "War on Poverty")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative; M1911A1
The Constitutional requirement for a trial by a jury of peers is there because the Founding Fathers had a deep distrust of judges and prosecutors.

The last thing Zimmerman should have is a bench trial. His chances of a fair trial are twelve times greater with a jury.

7 posted on 05/19/2012 8:28:46 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it and the law is what WE say it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson