Posted on 05/17/2012 8:14:15 PM PDT by RightFighter
I can see it with FF and Adblock plus.
OK, what happened to the bag the iced tea was in?
In the video at the 7-11 we clearly see the clerk put the can in a bag, in the photo here there is no bag.
Maybe not a major point, but definitely a loose end, which is always bad.
If you’re using NoScript, Temp allow all of that page and it will work...
Clicked on the link and no video clip.
My question too. Also, Trayvon Martin's hands are missing in the drawing. Is a complete drawing available somewhere?
On the note of trayvon coming back around to fight and keeping the video of him in the store in mind, were trayvon’s pants on the ground when the cops found his dead body?
His pants were “on the ground” in the video when he was buying IT and skillets. If he was going to attack someone, which I believe he did, he would have first probably pulled up his “drawas” so he would be a bit more mobile for the attack.
If his pants were up around his waist when they found his dead body, case closed, he premeditated the attack on Zimmerman.
Threw the bag away? Wadded it up and put it in a pocket?
The autopsy also says that the abdomen was scaphoid and had 1.5cm of SQ fat. Martin was very lean and muscular. 5’11” and 158 lbs.
Working fine for me.
Ad blocker?
Another problem is the location of the shooting. Zimmerman said he was going back to his car, but the body bag is in the middle of a walkway, and there is no way to tell where Zimmerman’s truck is. I saw a path map on a previous thread, but I can’t find it now.
Seems like Trayvon’s cellphone was scattered on the grass but his headphones were in his pocket. I’m not sure how that could fit with “DeeDee’s” claims about Trayvon being attacked while he was still talking to her, unless he was talking to her without using his headset.
Have they said where this store is? I’ve been curious about that for a while.
You may be underestimating the jury’s fear of being lynched by the mob if they acquit him. You know their identities are not going to be kept secret, and they have to worry about life after the trial.
Somebody help me make sense out of p 105 where it’s talking about the swabs taken from the gun and holster. Seems like it’s saying that there were 2 people’s DNA on the handle, the main one being George Zimmerman and the other person being somebody besides Trayvon. There wasn’t enough found on the trigger or slide to determine anything. And there was DNA from at least 3 people on the holster - the chief one being George Zimmerman, and Trayvon can’t be ruled out as one of the other 2.
Do people handle other people’s guns and/or holsters? The cops wouldn’t have handled that stuff without gloves or something to keep their own DNA/fingerprints off, would they? What does all this mean?
“When you see the pictures of Zimmerman, he probably is 5’6” to 5’8” tall and 150 -160 pounds. Trayvon is 6’ plus and prabably 180 lbs or more.”
The autopsy report lists him at 71” (5’ 11”) and 159 lbs.
The autopsy had just a single bruise on one knuckle. One thing the defense needs to do is DNA testing of Trayvon’s shoes, the hand damage isn’t consistent with George’s facial injuries, there must have been some other mechanism of injury.
Of interest is that the gunshot expert who did the clothing analysis described it as consistent with a contact shot.
Here’s a convenient document package.
http://media.miamiherald.com/smedia/2012/05/17/21/26/aOYtz.So.56.pdf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.