Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Steelfish

The cover is a blatant attempt to generate controversy. Nothing wrong with extended breast feeding. Something very wrong with the way the photo is posed, which frankly does sexualize nursing.


5 posted on 05/10/2012 9:08:20 PM PDT by lastchance ("Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis" St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lastchance
“The cover is a blatant attempt to generate controversy. Nothing wrong with extended breast feeding. Something very wrong with the way the photo is posed, which frankly does sexualize nursing.”

Exactly! This is not a tender Mary Cassatt painting. TIME wreaks of desperation peddling copies of their irrelevant magazine using a misguided woman's boobs.

37 posted on 05/11/2012 2:37:39 AM PDT by Casie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: lastchance

“Something very wrong with the way the photo is posed”

Yeah, you could say that.

It’s a sick picture and the woman is extremely sick to allow her and her child to be shown that way.

This is the MSM folks, as their downward spiral continues.

I wish Al Goldstein were alive today, I’d love to hear his take on this.


53 posted on 05/11/2012 4:45:10 AM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson