Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson

So... you head up this site...

but you won’t vote for the GOP nominee because he’s not pure enough for you?

Do you think others should follow your lead?

There’s no doubt, Jim, what you stand for and what your beliefs are.

But right now ... I’m of a younger generation and I have friends even younger than me ...

We are scared SCARED as in .... SCARED about what four more years of Obama could bring.

We didn’t want Romney... but Cain couldn’t keep it in his pants.
Bachmann made too many stupid statements
Gingrich couldn’t speak about social issues with authority
Santorum didn’t have the base and had a sick child....

What would you like for your site?

Do you just want old grumpy people who will refuse to do their civic duty because they don’t like Romney?

What the Republicans/Tea Party needs to do is regroup and concentrate on local elections for Congress and Senate. We did it in Illinois. We got a Republican Congressman in my District and a Republican Senator replaced Obama.

There’s no use here fighting over the GOP nominee. It’s going to be Romney.


79 posted on 05/05/2012 9:02:24 PM PDT by Winstons Julia (Hello OWS? We don't need a revolution like China's; China needs a revolution like OURS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Winstons Julia
"but you won’t vote for the GOP nominee because he’s not pure enough for you?"

This "purity" schtick has been trotted out by every RINO apologist from the get-go to browbeat Conservatives into being good little slaves/lemmings for the GOP. Congrats, kids. You've hit the mother lode. You've now got a nominee so far removed from the "purity" of honesty, ethics, and morality (nevermind Conservatism) that you'll have a Socialist-Marxist runoff in November. There won't even be a lesser of two evils between these two abominations. It's just plain evil vs. evil. Well, guy, I'm not playing that game no mo'. My soul ain't for sale.

88 posted on 05/05/2012 9:14:37 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: Winstons Julia

Look, there is no doubt whatsoever about Romney being a liberal progressive. Our pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-constitution, pro-liberty principles mean absolutely nothing to him. They’re just talking points that he can give lip service to one way or the other. And he has. He’s been on all sides on all issues and back and forth on most. And he lies. A lot. I’ve posted at least 10,000 times over the last seven or eight years that I would never vote for this progressive bastard so don’t be shocked. Rove screwed the pooch not me.


91 posted on 05/05/2012 9:22:33 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson