I have yet to find a reason to doubt the evidence provided by Mark (I see Mark as clearly as being the "dark boy" all grown up) and I have not seen sufficient evidence to support your claims that X was the daddy and SADO was not the mom, and there is another BHO II who is not the current president.
I wonder what the folks in possession of this alleged evidence are waiting for?
If BHO Sr. and Ruth didn't arrive in Kenya together until late 1964 when Barry was three and in HI, how could they be pictured together with a two-year-old and a five-year-old seeming to be their children (the same two children in the picture in the studio)...and that two-year-old child somehow be Barry?
The time-line doesn't work for the child with Ruth and Senior that resembles baby Barry to actually BE baby Barry, IMO. The baby that Mark says is David has a lot more baby hair than baby Barry, it can be seen, and neither appear to have had their first haircut.
If BHO Sr. and Ruth didn't arrive in Kenya together until late 1964 when Barry was three and in HI, how could they be pictured together with a two-year-old and a five-year-old seeming to be their children (the same two children in the picture in the studio)...and that two-year-old child somehow be Barry? Because they are not the same two children in the studio!(The image of the two little boys.)
IT'S NOW 1965-66, MARK IS ABOUT A YEAR OLD, AND THE DARK BOY IS FOUR GOING ON FIVE.
Ruth is reported to have followed the kenyan to Nairobi several weeks after he left the US in the Fall of 1964. They married on Christmas eve 1964.
Ruth and her child x 2 - and if you haven't worked out yet why they needed to invent a 'David' and killed him off in a motor-cycle accident, there's nothing I can do to enlighten you.