Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Nerks

Nudie also seems to have a slight widow’s peak, and lower hairline.


115 posted on 04/26/2012 4:28:39 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell. Signed, a fanatic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

One of the original, provocative images of that girl, who-ever she was, had the name of the website and a serial number on the photograph, we traced that to a vintage porno site, mildly pornographic, divided into sections...one of which was vintage photographs of women in high heels and stockings.
The image bearing that particular serial number had clearly been removed from the webpage it was on...so whoever decided to use this image to infer that it was a photograph of Stanley Ann Dunham must have had a connection to the site itself, to be able to remove all the originals...

And now we are being told the photographs were discovered in the home of Frank Marshall Davis?

It was YEARS ago I first posted the details of the origin of the images, so long ago...I didn’t bother to keep the link to the website. It’s true isn’t it, ‘a lie travels halfway around the world before the truth can get it’s pants on...’

Did you know there are STILL people who believe the image of Barbara Bush sitting in the sand wearing a demure bathing suit is a photograph of Stanley Ann Dunham in a bikini? I had to write to THAT particular website a number of times before they removed it. Too late...the lie had already travelled halfway (OR ALL) around the world...


124 posted on 04/26/2012 5:24:55 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson