My understanding is that women rebel against the “exclusivity” expectations simply because it is typically assumed to only apply to women(or at least more strenuously towards women) and also that they naturally prefer exclusivity if not for this specific contention.
Therefore, I believe I have a marketable concept with my idea of a “FWB+exclusivity+marriage cert.”. My concept implies that the exclusivity works both-ways or no-ways.
Now, lets examine the “exclusivity” concept. Certain kinds of women are uncomfortable with the morality concepts that demand exclusivity. They do so because they feel these antiquated codes of morality were designed by men to help men subjugate women. If we separate out the concept of exclusivity from morality, then we stop antagonizing these kinds of women. Assuming these women have innate inbred desires of exclusivity hardwired into their brains(which I think is the case) I think we can convince them to go with their natural urges simply by removing the stigma(as perceived by them) from it...which is traditional biblical morality.
Good luck with that, what you’re wanting is a conflict in terms, FWB made exclusive with a contract.
In order for this to have a prayer, you’ll want a woman who thinks and to a certain extent acts like a man, while still being attracted to men, and also one with a strong moral underpinning while being irreligious.
Don’t want much, do you, lol? Sounds like an Ayn Rand protagonist, but Ayn Rand was no joy to be around in real life; she treated her husband very poorly, cuckholded him right to his face, humiliated him routinely.